9-11 Fulfilled Two Agendas-Part 2

9-11 “Arab Hijackers” Theory Questioned and Exposed Herein:

8) There was highly unusual options trading activities in American and United Airlines stocks as well as some insurance and Re insurance companies in days prior to 9-11. The complicity of private parties, federal government and outside foreign powers like state of Israel is breathtaking.;

9) The owner of the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein, renewed and increased insurance coverage of these buildings due to “acts of terrorism” prior to 9-11 events. How interesting that the government had no clue of such planned 9-11 events.;

10) It must be coincidence that Marvin Bush (George W. Bush’s brother) and the security firm, Securacom/Stratesec he worked for (Chairperson of this firm) along with Dov Zakheim (see below) were in charge of building security for Twin Towers and Dulles/Logan Airport. It has been reported (not in mainstream media) that bomb-sniffing dogs were not allowed and certain floors were cleared out as part of security protocols prior to 9-11 events. How can you have implosion of buildings without rigging them with explosives?;

11) There are several reports including eye witness accounts by first responders about how the World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) which was not hit by any aircraft and yet it also imploded like a house of cards having hallmarks of “controlled demolition” just similar to the quick collapse of Twin Towers on 9-11. Interestingly, in peer-reviewed paper titled “On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” Robert Korol, a civil engineering professor emeritus and a fellow of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, along with Steven Jones, former professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth along with 2,936 signatures from engineers and architects state that “controlled demolition” remains important means of how Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed in such expedient fashion. According to the article, “Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise — nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-storey office building,” they argue. “Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.”;

12) A day prior to 9-11, then Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld and announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story was ignored under 9-11’s rubble. Interestingly, Dov Zakheim, former Bush appointee as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004 was not able to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Both sums of money occurred under Dov Zakheim’s watch at the Pentagon. Interestingly, in addition to Dov Zakheim’s involvement at the Pentagon, it was the System Planning Corporation, (his firm’s) subsidiary, Tridata Corporation, that was in charge of the investigation of the first “terrorist” attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. These experiences would have given his firm and other associates intimate knowledge of the security systems and structural blueprints of the World Trade Center to create “controlled demolition” of the Twin Towers.

Of course, the F.B.I. and other government-led investigations (including 9-11 Commission) never questioned or pursued these areas of inquiry; the brilliancy of F.B.I.under Robert Mueller conducting investigation into 9-11 events and coming up with various mind-bending explanations makes one wonder about credibility, scope, and integrity Russian interference in national US election process (more on this topic later). Also, the federal investigative, intelligence and various federal agencies like F.E.M.A., U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) among others has engaged in conduct to present far-fetched theory and coverup to further hidden dual agenda stated before: to start war in near/Middle East and create Big Brother state apparatus. Speaking of “deep state,” the 9-11 events don’t get any deeper than this with exception of the Kennedy Assassination and few other major events (to be discussed in later topics).

There is more information to disclose, but dubious “facts” espoused and theories that are presented as “truth” by the government are considered the final words on 9-11 and similar historical, traumatic events. The government or state can, does, and has the power to distort, suppress, hide, lie, and ignore information and controverted facts so that its agenda can be achieved over the governed. This axiom is true just not for a federal republic like USA, but any form of government whereby unequal power structure exists between government and its public; only when one of the hallmarks of such relationship exhibits proven trust is governing by consent possible. But trust is implicitly tied to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help us (insert your favorite religious reference or phrase). If trust and truth are not foundations of any government, then new slogan may arise like, “In God we may believe, but in government we distrust.”

Do you really believe the U.S.A.  government-sponsored “Arab Hijackers” theory causing 9-11 as the undisputed truth?